Pear Lab (Princeton Univ.)

 

-----Original Message-----

From: PEARmail-US [mailto:PEARMAIL-US@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of Elissa Hoeger

Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:49 PM

To: PEARMAIL-US@Princeton.EDU

Subject: [(PEAR] PEAR news

 

Dear PEAR Friend,

 

In the event that you have not looked at the Publications page of the PEAR website recently, we bring your attention to three recent publications that have been added, the abstracts of which are reproduced below.

 

 

As we anticipate the closing of the physical laboratory in the not-too-distant future, much of our current effort has been focused on a comprehensive archiving enterprise to assure the availability of our data, publications, and insights to future generations of scholars.  Consistent with this agenda, "The PEAR Proposition"

<http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/Allen_Press/PEAR

Proposition.pdf> presents an overview of the goals, methods, and findings of the PEAR program over its 26-year history.

 

Abstract-For more than a quarter century, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory has engaged in a broad range of experiments on consciousness-related physical anomalies and has proposed a corresponding selection of theoretical models that have combined to illuminate the fundamental nature of the provocative phenomena that emerge.

Productive pursuit of this topic has inescapably involved a spectrum of political, cultural, personal, and interpersonal factors that are normally not encountered in more conventional scientific scholarship, but have both enriched and complicated the enterprise in many ways.  Some of the insights gleaned from the work are objectively specifiable, such as the scale and structural character of the anomalous effects; their relative insensitivity to objective physical correlates, including distance and time; the oscillating sequential patterns of performance they display; the major discrepancies between male and female achievements; and their irregular replicability at all levels of experience.  But many others relate to subjective issues, such as the responsiveness of the effects to conscious and unconscious intention and to individual and collective resonance; the relevance of ambience and attitude in their generation; and the importance of intrinsic uncertainty as a source of the anomalies.  This blend of empirical features predicates radical excursions of the dedicated models, and hence of the more general scientific paradigms, to allow consciousness and its subjective information processing capacities a proactive role in the establishment of objective reality, with all of the complications of specificity, causality, and reproducibility that entails.  The attendant complexities of conceptualization, formulation, and implementation notwithstanding, pragmatic applications of these phenomena in many sectors of public endeavor now can be foreseen.

 

 

A second archival document, which summarizes our extensive remote perception enterprise, is accessible as "Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research" <http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/IU.pdf>.

 

Abstract-This article has four purposes:  1) to present for the first time in archival form all results of some

25 years of remote perception research at this laboratory; 2) to describe all of the analytical scoring methods developed over the course of this program to quantify the amount of anomalous information acquired in the experiments; 3) to display a remarkable anti-correlation between the objective specificity of those methods and the anomalous yield of the experiments; and 4) to discuss the phenomenological and pragmatic implications of this complementarity.  The formal database comprises 653 experimental trials performed over several phases of investigation.  The scoring methods involve various arrays of descriptor queries that can be addressed to both the physical targets and the percipients' description thereof, the responses to which provide the basis for numerical evaluation and statistical assessment of the degree of anomalous information acquired.  Twenty-four such recipes have been employed, with queries posed in binary, ternary, quaternary, and ten-level distributive formats.  Thus treated, the database yields a composite z-score against chance of 5.418 (p =

3 x 10-8, one-tailed).  Numerous subsidiary analyses agree that these overall results are not significantly affected by any of the secondary protocol parameters tested, or by variations in descriptor effectiveness, possible participant response biases, target distance from the percipient, or time interval between perception effort and agent target visitation. However, over the course of the program there has been a striking diminution of the anomalous yield that appears to be associated with the participants' growing attention to, and dependence upon, the progressively more detailed descriptor formats and with the corresponding reduction in the content of the accompanying free-response transcripts.  The possibility that increased emphasis on objective quantification of the phenomenon somehow may have inhibited its inherently subjective expression is explored in several contexts, ranging from contemporary signal processing technologies to ancient divination traditions.  An intrinsic complementarity is suggested between the analytical and intuitive aspects of the remote perception process that, like its more familiar counterpart in quantum science, brings with it an inescapable uncertainty that limits the extent to which such anomalous effects can be simultaneously produced and evaluated.

 

 

Finally, "Sensors, Filters, and the Source of Reality"

<http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/Allen_Press/Filters%20pdf.pdf>

builds on our earlier efforts in "A Modular Model of Mind/Matter Manifestations (M5)" to establish a viable conceptual framework for meaningful representation of the empirical anomalies observed in our research.

 

Abstract-The failure of contemporary scientific theory to correlate and explicate anomalous consciousness-related physical phenomena may trace to inadequate comprehension of the process of information exchange between the mind and its ultimate source.

Elevation of the subjective capacities of consciousness to complementary status with the more objective physical senses, along with recognition of the bi-directional capabilities of both categories, allows establishment of resonant channels of communication between the mind and its source environment that can exceed conventional expectations.  In this manner, order can be introduced into randomnicity, and self-consistent realities can be extracted from transcendent chaos.  The key elements in tuning these channels to amplify such information creation are the physiological and psychological filters imposed upon them, some of which can be enhanced or altered by conscious or unconscious attention.  Specifically, such attitudinal tactics as openness to alternative perspectives, utilization of transdisciplinary metaphors, self-sacrificial resonance, tolerance of uncertainty, and replacement of dualistic rigor by mental complementarity can enable experiential realities that are responsive to intention, desire, or need, to an extent consistent with prevailing empirical evidence.

 

 

We hope you enjoy them.

 

 

With all best wishes,

Bob Jahn and Brenda Dunne

 

--

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.

Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.

Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 9/2/2005